ARTICLE | 9 MIN | THE ROAD AHEAD

Yen Behaving Badly

August 29, 2024

While ‘badly’ depends on your positioning, ‘strangely’ seems uncontroversial. Here are four strange behaviours.

Key takeaways:

  • The Japanese yen (JPY) is at multi-decade cheap valuations on a purchasing power parity (PPP) basis. The valuation elastic is stretched, meaning technical bumps can have an outsized impact
  • Rate differentials as a driver of JPY were largely ignored in the pre-Covid world. Now they’re not
  • From GFC to Covid, the yen was a reliable safe haven. In 2022, it wasn’t
  • The inverse correlation between JPY and TOPIX outperformance is at multi decade lows. That won’t necessarily continue

With apologies to readers less well-versed in the 1990s British sitcom subculture. And ‘badly’ of course depends on your perspective. Perhaps ‘strangely’ would be better. Then again, looking at Figure 1, you’d be forgiven for thinking that this was a headline in search of a story. Then again (again) we are still at trailing 10-year highs on a realised risk basis, while implied volatility is spiking, even if not to the extent of prior stress points. Moreover, the chart fails to capture the exogenous debate: all those knowing allusions to the Japanese yen carry trade we’re all pretending make perfect sense. Here’s my two sen’s worth on the current state of play. Worth a bit more, I hope.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

The yen is very (very) cheap. At least as the purists would look at it. Figure 2 shows the relative discount/premium of JPY versus three purchasing power parity (PPP) models, which imply that, relative to the dollar, the currency is valued as cheaply as at any point since at least the early 1970s. The pragmatists would counter that PPP is a nice idea which doesn’t survive first contact with reality. Due to tariffs and other trade restrictions, unconventional monetary policy, basket compositional issues and so on. All fair.

But over longer time horizons, a child’s playground trading logic says purchasing power must have some bearing on the relative attractiveness of a given token. And it is also partially borne out in the empirics. Taking the six local troughs in the three lines of Figure 2 (Feb ’85, Apr ’90, Jul ’98, Mar ’02, Jun ’07 and Jul ’15), the five-year forward yen move against the US dollar averages 6% annualised, appreciating in 100% of instances. Today, the carry trade, as well as other technical gyrations, are being amped up by valuation elastic which is as taut as it has been in living memory. Let’s not be surprised if that results in some large moves.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

Source: OECD, The Economist, Bloomberg, Man Group calculations. For our model we are indebted to the work of Chester Ntonifor at BCA Research. We split the CPI baskets of US and Japan into 10 broad categories, take the weighting of each, and then take the average of those weights to create a custom US-Japan equivalent goods baskets. We then apply the percent change in the ratio of these baskets to the USDJPY exchange rate prevailing at the start of the 1970s, and cumulatively going forwards. Further detail available on request.

Have rate differentials returned as a driver of JPY returns? Since Covid, dollar-yen has broadly moved in line with the US-Japan real yield differential. BC, it didn’t. Figure 3 is your staple, *fiddle with the axes, put one line on top of another and see how nicely they match up* chart. Or not. However, in this instance, I do think even a simple analysis like this makes a serious point. Uncovered rate parity models can be viewed as another form of PPP, but where the ‘good’ in question is capital. There is therefore the same elegant logic as to why the force should be kept in balance, at least over the long term. Why then does there seem to be the step change at least optically illustrated in Figure 3?

One idea is that rate differentials were less important in a world where both absolute rates and rate differentials were lower, and where the volatility of the latter was also less. It was just less visible, so we all paid less attention to it. And indeed, comparing the periods in the left and right panels of Figure 3, average US real rates doubled from 0.3% to 0.6%, the mean differential between US and Japan rose from 72 to 112bps, and the standard deviation in the differential changes went from nine to 13bps.

One swallow does not a summer make. And indeed, looking at the correlation between the percent change in the real yield differential and the same for the exchange rate, while the sign does change from negative to positive between the two time periods in Figure 3, the magnitude of both is very small. But in the historically unusual environment where the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is hiking rates while the Federal Reserve (Fed) cuts, the potential continuation and intensification of this pattern is something I’m going to be watching closely. Moreover, one school of thought says that the BoJ is more focused on yen and Japanese government bond (JGB) volatility, than with any particular level. If that’s right, then Figure 1 could ultimately exacerbate the division with the Fed. We’ve taken the big step of negative to positive base rate and, in the context of long-term history, the gyrations haven’t been THAT bad. We go again, and don’t spare the horses.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

Another question that’s up in the air is whether JPY is still the safe haven to own in a global risk-off episode. Each segment on the x axis of Figure 4 is a period where the S&P 500 Index drew down by 10% or more from its local peak. The aqua blue bars are the total return you would have felt through that time going long JPY short USD. Pink is the same but instead of being long JPY you are buying an equal weighted basket of other DM currencies. Navy blue circles are the difference between the two. Those are positive 70% of the time and by an average of 3.5%. On this same basis, the yen enjoyed a particularly good run in the 10 episodes from the Global Financial Crisis to the end of 2020, where it was always positive, with a median difference of 11%.

So far, so good. However glancing through Figure 4, one is left with an unease that when a sell-off has an inflationary tinge to it (1973-74, 1979, 1980-82), or a bubble unwind aspect (2000-02), or indeed both (2022), the risk hedge wavers. Now my view is that the next risk-off move is likely to be a conventional, and relatively moderate, economic slowdown. Somewhere between Orthoclase and Quartz kind of landing on a Mohs Hardness Scale.1 But equally, we are in a world where Tech is at least richly hyped, even if not in a bona fide bubble, and where many structural inflation drivers arguably remain in place.2 The dynamic, in other words, is toward more unpredictability in how the classical JPY rules-of-thumb might operate, greater potential for strange (bad?) behaviour.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

A final metric for the dashboard is the correlation between JPY returns and the relative performance of Japanese equities. People often talk of these two variables being negatively correlated. In other words, Japanese stocks outperforming when the yen is weak, due to the export-oriented nature of the TOPIX. Figure 5 suggests this mental shortcut is likely too crude. TOPIX outperformance, more often than not, comes with JPY strength.

It is, however, true now. The current inverse relation between currency and equity relative returns is as negative as it’s ever been in the 30+ years shown in the chart. Today possibly bears some echo of former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s neoliberal reforms in the early noughties, where a manufacturing boom drove the currency and the market up together. The more recent pattern of economic activity -- the deflationary fears (often realised) that have dogged corporate Japan -- is one where a stronger yen potentially heightens depression concern, via downward price pressure on imports as well as a translation effect. Possibly this is the driver behind the periods of positive relation in Figure 5. My near term view is that the yen is currently so weak, as already discussed, that it can strengthen without continued adverse impact on the stock market.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

The yen is cheap. It is probably more responsive to rate differentials than it was. And in a world where divergence between central banks is becoming less unusual, it’s probably still a safe haven. But this is less predictable in a world of greater structural inflation and a richly valued Tech sector. It is currently moving highly inversely with TOPIX outperformance, but the continuation of this pattern is not a given.

In short, unpredictability is on the menu. And this is being exacerbated by some pretty punchy positioning. I have mentioned the infamous yen carry trade only in passing, because enough ink spilled, but it seems uncontroversial that this has led to one of the most rapid reversals in hedge fund positioning (from max short to slight long) ever seen (Figure 6). Meanwhile, in real money world, the latest BAML fund manager survey (220 respondents covering US$590 billion of AUM) has a net 40% reading saying JPY is undervalued, a high point going back to the questionnaire’s inception in 2005.

Strange times, in sum. For me, there’s a decent argument for unhedged Japanese equities. But expect turbulence.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

1. See:https://www.man.com/maninstitute/road-ahead-rock-solid
2. See here for my original discussion on these, a lot of which remains relevant, in my view: https://www.man.com/maninstitute/inflation-regime-roadmap

For further clarification on the terms which appear here, please visit our Glossary page.

This information is communicated and/or distributed by the relevant Man entity identified below (collectively the "Company") subject to the following conditions and restriction in their respective jurisdictions.

Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. Unless stated otherwise all information is provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Unless stated otherwise this information is communicated by the relevant entity listed below.

Australia: To the extent this material is distributed in Australia it is communicated by Man Investments Australia Limited ABN 47 002 747 480 AFSL 240581, which is regulated by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission ('ASIC'). This information has been prepared without taking into account anyone’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

Austria/Germany/Liechtenstein: To the extent this material is distributed in Austria, Germany and/or Liechtenstein it is communicated by Man (Europe) AG, which is authorised and regulated by the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority (FMA). Man (Europe) AG is registered in the Principality of Liechtenstein no. FL-0002.420.371-2. Man (Europe) AG is an associated participant in the investor compensation scheme, which is operated by the Deposit Guarantee and Investor Compensation Foundation PCC (FL-0002.039.614-1) and corresponds with EU law. Further information is available on the Foundation's website under www.eas-liechtenstein.li.

European Economic Area: Unless indicated otherwise this material is communicated in the European Economic Area by Man Asset Management (Ireland) Limited (‘MAMIL’) which is registered in Ireland under company number 250493 and has its registered office at 70 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 2, Ireland. MAMIL is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under number C22513.

Hong Kong SAR: To the extent this material is distributed in Hong Kong SAR, this material is communicated by Man Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.

Japan: To the extent this material is distributed in Japan it is communicated by Man Group Japan Limited, Financial Instruments Business Operator, Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial instruments firms) No. 624 for the purpose of providing information on investment strategies, investment services, etc. provided by Man Group, and is not a disclosure document based on laws and regulations. This material can only be communicated only to professional investors (i.e. specific investors or institutional investors as defined under Financial Instruments Exchange Law) who may have sufficient knowledge and experience of related risks.

Switzerland: To the extent this material is made available in Switzerland the communicating entity is:

  • For Clients (as such term is defined in the Swiss Financial Services Act): Man Investments (CH) AG, Huobstrasse 3, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland. Man Investment (CH) AG is regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (‘FINMA’); and
  • For Financial Service Providers (as defined in Art. 3 d. of FINSA, which are not Clients): Man Investments AG, Huobstrasse 3, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland, which is regulated by FINMA.

United Kingdom: Unless indicated otherwise this material is communicated in the United Kingdom by Man Solutions Limited ('MSL') which is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under number 3385362. MSL is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the 'FCA') under number 185637 and has its registered office at Riverbank House, 2 Swan Lane, London, EC4R 3AD, United Kingdom.

United States: To the extent this material is distributed in the United States, it is communicated and distributed by Man Investments, Inc. (‘Man Investments’). Man Investments is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘FINRA’). Man Investments is also a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (‘SIPC’). Man Investments is a wholly owned subsidiary of Man Group plc. The registration and memberships described above in no way imply a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC, FINRA or the SIPC have endorsed Man Investments. Man Investments Inc, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 21st Floor, New York, NY 10105.

This material is proprietary information and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent. Any data services and information available from public sources used in the creation of this material are believed to be reliable. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. © Man 2025