Man Institute > How To Leave Your Child A Million Dollars

ARTICLE | 7 MIN | THE ROAD AHEAD

How To Leave Your Child A Million Dollars

December 1, 2022

Portfolio construction is an often overlooked area of finance. Presenting a light-hearted thought experiment to show why it shouldn't be.

Before we start a disclaimer. You can put us in the camp that says a financial inheritance generally takes more than it gives to the beneficiary. Few things more impressive than a self-made man. So be careful taking that opportunity away from them, is our parenting tuppence worth.

Still, anything for a snappy title. And indeed it gives us the opportunity to demonstrate a) the power of combining assets and strategies that diversify, b) the optimal ways of making said combinations but also c) the limits thereof. As multi-asset investors this is our daily bailiwick, albeit on an institutional rather than individual level. For the majority of people who do not share our nerdy interest in portfolio construction, there will hopefully be some interesting statistics and bon mots along the way.

To start, some assumptions. The average starting salary for a university graduate in the United States is USD55,000.1 The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts the long term growth rate of average hourly earnings at 3%. If we take this and assume a 40-year working life, that would mean we can take a heuristic that a typical worker today will end their career on USD179,000. Further assume that our theoretical worker dies at 79 (the current average age of death in the US), invests monthly while working, and that his savings pool continues to compound at the rate of return achieved during his working life until retirement. To keep things simple let’s say the current all-in personal tax rate of 28% stays static.2 What level of saving rate and return above inflation will achieve an inheritance for his child of USD1 million in today’s money? Please show your working…

Fret not. We’ve done the maths for you, answers in Figure 1. Over the last 70 years the US saving rate has averaged 9%. Let’s assume five percentage points of this are required to provide a nest egg for retirement income, meaning we have an effective saving rate of 4%. At this level we would require a return ahead of inflation of 8.3% to generate 1 million 2022 dollars by the date of death.

Figure 1. Size of Inflation-Adjusted Legacy at Death

Source: Bloomberg, Shiller, Man Solutions; as of 31 October 2022.

The obvious next question is what rate of inflation do we expect our hypothetical worker to feel. Figure 2 shows the average annual price rises experienced by a person who had a 40-year career, a 15-year retirement, then shuffled off the perch. There is a surprising amount of variability. Someone dying in the 1920s and 1930s would have experienced only 1% inflation per annum through their adult lives. Someone dying in the mid-1990s would have felt 4.5%, which has moderated to around 4% for someone dying today. If we take the average across the whole chart, we get 3%. Which seems as sensible a number as any.

Figure 2. Average Rate of Inflation Felt During Adult Life for an Individual Dying in a Given Year

Source: Bloomberg, Shiller, Man Solutions; as of 31 October 2022.

So the bottom line is that we need a nominal return of 11.3%. Which feels punchy. But is it insurmountable? In Figure 3 we give various summary statistics for the three main asset classes as we see them – equities, bonds and alternatives – over the past 100 years. Here are four observations:

  1. There is no unlevered combination of assets which will realise our desired 11% return. A 100% equity portfolio only gets us 10%, and with 60%+ max drawdown, which is likely to be unacceptable to most investors;
  2. The average pairwise correlation between the three assets is 0.1, they therefore represent attractive diversifying components of a portfolio;
  3. Equities have the advantage of producing the best return per unit of leverage, but the disadvantage of a drawdown which is likely too painful for many investors, and a distribution which is heavily leptokurtic, indicating an increased preponderance to tail events;
  4. While alternatives are the most attractive asset in Sharpe ratio terms, and almost perfectly normally distributed, that must be weighed against a higher correlation with equities (although still low in the absolute sense), as well as, from a practical perspective, a higher fee load (which we do not consider here for convenience reasons).

Figure 3. Summary Statistics (Above) and Correlation Matrix (Below) for Equities, Bonds and Alternatives Over the Last 100 years3

Source: Bloomberg, Shiller, Man Solutions; as of 31 October 2022.

How best to combine these assets? The temptation is strong to torture the data into a max Sharpe confession, but that wouldn’t be fair. Instead, we cue off volatility as the most predictable statistic. To see this observe Figure 4, where we show 10-year trailing annualised return and volatility for US equities. Volatility has three long periods of relative stability: 1810-1833 (where it stays around 5%), 1873-1929 (12%) and 1950 to present (15%). Return on the other hand moves in much more directional patterns.

Figure 4. Ten-Year Rolling Volatility and Return for US Equities

Source: Bloomberg, Shiller, Man Solutions; as of 22 November 2022.

Rounded to the nearest ten, the allocation that gets closest to equalising the risk contribution from each of the three assets is 20% equity, 40% bonds, 40% alternatives. However, this only gets us a 7.5% return. To get to our 11.3% number we must lever this portfolio 1.5x to reach 30/60/60. In Figure 5 we show the performance of both these portfolios with summary statistics for 30/60/60.

Figure 5. Long Term Performance 20/40/40 and 30/60/60 Portfolios

Source: Bloomberg, Shiller, Man Solutions; as of 22 November 2022.

What can we say about the resulting portfolio:

  1. Despite being 1.5x levered it has just two-thirds of the volatility of a 100% equity portfolio. Leverage is a dirty word and, in the wrong hands, rightly so. But thought of in volatility terms it is perhaps more accurate to think of it as ‘exposure management’;
  2. A similar effect is seen if one defines risk according to drawdown rather than overall volatility, with the resulting portfolio delivering half the max drawdown of a non-levered equity-only vehicle;
  3. The diversification inherent in the low correlations between the three assets shows up in increased risk efficiency. The 1.4 Sharpe is higher than for any of the assets individually (per Figure 3);
  4. The distribution of returns is not far off normal (taking the heuristics that -1 to +1 is normal skew and -7 to +7 is normal kurtosis). This means that if the 100 years of data we show in Figure 5 are any guide, our investor can expect a 10% or more YoY drawdown less than 3% of the time, and a 5% or more MoM drawdown about 1% of the time.

Now clearly, we plucked the USD1 million present value dollars hurdle out of thin air. But whatever your financial goals, either as an individual or an institution, we think this way of thinking is a useful starting point. But for the individual we repeat the warning we began with – large financial inheritances often weigh heavy, like the dead Albatross around the neck of the Ancient Mariner.

1. Based on October 2022 data from Zippia.
2. As estimated by the OECD
3. Equity is Professor Shiller’s US equity series. Bond is represented by the UST10 and is taken from GFD. Alternatives represent a portfolio of equal capital weights to commodities, trend and equity long/short. Commodities are proxied with an equal weight portfolio of all futures contracts as they appear through history. Pre-1946 this is based off work done by AQR and post that date we use futures contracts from the Man AHL database. Trend is a long-term portfolio constructed by Many AHL which aims to replicate the exposures of the BTOP50 index at 15% volatility, covering commodities, FX, equities and bonds. Equity long/short is volatility scaled equal weight portfolio across the Fama-French SMB, HML and Mom. factors, as well as the AQR BAB and QMJ factors. All returns are nominal and annualised.

For further clarification on the terms which appear here, please visit our Glossary page.

This information is communicated and/or distributed by the relevant Man entity identified below (collectively the "Company") subject to the following conditions and restriction in their respective jurisdictions.

Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. Unless stated otherwise all information is provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Unless stated otherwise this information is communicated by the relevant entity listed below.

Australia: To the extent this material is distributed in Australia it is communicated by Man Investments Australia Limited ABN 47 002 747 480 AFSL 240581, which is regulated by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission ('ASIC'). This information has been prepared without taking into account anyone’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

Austria/Germany/Liechtenstein: To the extent this material is distributed in Austria, Germany and/or Liechtenstein it is communicated by Man (Europe) AG, which is authorised and regulated by the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority (FMA). Man (Europe) AG is registered in the Principality of Liechtenstein no. FL-0002.420.371-2. Man (Europe) AG is an associated participant in the investor compensation scheme, which is operated by the Deposit Guarantee and Investor Compensation Foundation PCC (FL-0002.039.614-1) and corresponds with EU law. Further information is available on the Foundation's website under www.eas-liechtenstein.li.

European Economic Area: Unless indicated otherwise this material is communicated in the European Economic Area by Man Asset Management (Ireland) Limited (‘MAMIL’) which is registered in Ireland under company number 250493 and has its registered office at 70 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 2, Ireland. MAMIL is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under number C22513.

Hong Kong SAR: To the extent this material is distributed in Hong Kong SAR, this material is communicated by Man Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.

Japan: To the extent this material is distributed in Japan it is communicated by Man Group Japan Limited, Financial Instruments Business Operator, Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial instruments firms) No. 624 for the purpose of providing information on investment strategies, investment services, etc. provided by Man Group, and is not a disclosure document based on laws and regulations. This material can only be communicated only to professional investors (i.e. specific investors or institutional investors as defined under Financial Instruments Exchange Law) who may have sufficient knowledge and experience of related risks.

Switzerland: To the extent this material is made available in Switzerland the communicating entity is:

  • For Clients (as such term is defined in the Swiss Financial Services Act): Man Investments (CH) AG, Huobstrasse 3, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland. Man Investment (CH) AG is regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (‘FINMA’); and
  • For Financial Service Providers (as defined in Art. 3 d. of FINSA, which are not Clients): Man Investments AG, Huobstrasse 3, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland, which is regulated by FINMA.

United Kingdom: Unless indicated otherwise this material is communicated in the United Kingdom by Man Solutions Limited ('MSL') which is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under number 3385362. MSL is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the 'FCA') under number 185637 and has its registered office at Riverbank House, 2 Swan Lane, London, EC4R 3AD, United Kingdom.

United States: To the extent this material is distributed in the United States, it is communicated and distributed by Man Investments, Inc. (‘Man Investments’). Man Investments is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘FINRA’). Man Investments is also a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (‘SIPC’). Man Investments is a wholly owned subsidiary of Man Group plc. The registration and memberships described above in no way imply a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC, FINRA or the SIPC have endorsed Man Investments. Man Investments Inc, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 21st Floor, New York, NY 10105.

This material is proprietary information and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent. Any data services and information available from public sources used in the creation of this material are believed to be reliable. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. © Man 2025