Bolsonaro’s Pension Reform: The Real Deal?

On 20 February, the Bolsonaro administration submitted its pension reform proposal to Congress, which, in our view, is the first – and most critical – element required to help set Brazil back on a sustainable debt trajectory.

Officially estimated to offer savings of BRL1.16 trillion ($312 billion) over 10 years,1 the reforms introduced a minimum retirement age of 65 for men and 62 for women (versus the current pension plan of a minimum contribution time of 35 years for men and 30 years for women, which typically translates to an average retirement age of 54 and 52 years, respectively).

While polls show more support for pension reforms than in the past, we view execution risk related to the passage of the reforms as high: First, legislative pushback may result in dilution of the estimated savings impact – potentially between BRL400 billion and BRL60 billion of savings.1 Second, the proposed reform requires amending the constitution, which needs the support of over 60% of both houses of Congress in two rounds of voting. Such a high level of consensus is likely to face challenges in a highly fragmented congress, particularly in the Lower House, which requires 308 deputies out of 513 in two votes before going to the Senate.

Political capital is typically highest during the first year of office. As such, the next few months will be critical as a positive outcome from the Lower House needs to be achieved by June 2019 (before breaking for mid-year recess in July), so that the proposal can then be sent to Senate by the second half of the year.

Even if a diluted pension reform gets passed, we believe that additional measures, including freezing the minimum wage in real terms, is necessary in order to return to a sustainable debt trajectory: Gross general government debt climbed to 77% of GDP in 2018, according to our calculations, and is rising at an unsustainable pace. As such, we estimate the primary balance needs to improve by more than 3% of GDP (from -1.8% to +1.5%) to achieve a sustainable debt trajectory.

Brazilian government 5-year credit default swaps were at 163 basis points and the carry on the Brazilian real (annualizing 6-month forwards) was 2.8% as of 22 February.2 While the passage of pension reform could give the administration the ammunition and/or time to pass additional measures, our view is that the market appears to be pricing in too much optimism relative to the execution risk and fiscal improvements that are yet to be achieved.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

Source: The Economist, OECD, IMF; As of 20 February, 2019 *Or latest available

Deal, No Deal, Who Cares? GBP/EUR Totally Range-Bound

UK Prime Minister Theresa May has delayed the Members of Parliament’s (‘MPs’) “meaningful vote” to 12 March, just 17 days before the UK is due to leave the EU. The vote was originally planned for 27 February.

This has dismayed some businesses, European leaders and Europhile MPs. The market, however – as determined by the GBPEUR exchange rate – appears to be pricing in some sort of deal being reached. Indeed, as Figure 2 shows, the GBPEUR has been trading in a pretty tight range over the past year, and is currently at the top end of that range.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

Source: As of 25 February, 2019

The Impact of the Trade War…

The US has delayed an increase in tariffs on USD200 billion of Chinese goods, initially set for 1 March.

Unsurprisingly, stocks with the most revenue exposure to China3 underperformed their sector peers in the second half of 2018, and mostly significantly in September and October. Surprisingly, though, while the main trade tensions were between the US and China, non-US companies were equally hard hit (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Average Sector-Relative Return of Most China Exposed3 Stocks

Source: Man Numeric, Factset; As of 31 December, 2018

…As China Stimulates Its Economy

January credit data for China was the largest on record, with approximately USD700 billion of new credit issued. This is the latest in a series of clear signs that the government is stimulating the economy again, following the launch of a central bank-backed bond swap in January, plus reductions in bank reserve requirements. Relative to GDP, this is the second-largest January in the last 10 years, and is supportive of our expectations that data will be visibly improving by the second quarter of this year.

Problems loading this infographic? - Please click here

Source: Bloomberg, Man GLG, as of January 31, 2019

Alongside the release of the credit data was China’s monetary aggregates, which poured some cold water on this constructive view: M1 growth in January was just +0.4% year on year. There is much commentary pointing out the lunar New Year impact on M1, namely that year-end bonuses have depressed corporate demand deposits, and that this will normalise in February. We are optimistic that this could be the case.

However, in the meantime, we are cognisant of the long-term relationship between M1 and nominal GDP growth, which looks as though some more patience may be required before fully backing the turnaround in the cycle.

Figure 5: The Chinese Credit Impulse

The Chinese Credit Impulse

Source: Bloomberg, as of January 31, 2019

With contribution from: Lisa Chua (Man GLG, Portfolio Manager), Matthew Sargaison (Man AHL, co-CEO), Ed Cole (Man GLG, Managing Director), Rob Furdak (Man Numeric, co-CIO) and Ed Fang (Man Numeric, Deputy Director of Research).

1. https://www.ft.com/content/ba196f86-3525-11e9-bb0c-42459962a812
2. Source: Bloomberg
3. At least 30% of revenues coming from China as of June 30, 2018

Download Full Article

Important information

Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. This material is proprietary information of the Company and its affiliates and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent from the Company. The Company believes the content to be accurate. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. The Company does not assume any liability in the case of incorrectly reported or incomplete information. Unless stated otherwise all information is provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

1617653/US/GL/R/W

Please update your browser

Unfortunately we no longer support Internet Explorer 8, 7 and older for security reasons.

Please update your browser to a later version and try to access our site again.

Many thanks.